Indictments and a Guilty Plea. So far.

Discussion in 'World Events' started by Dabob2, Oct 31, 2017.

Random Thread
  1. Dabob2

    Dabob2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2003
    Messages:
    642
    Likes Received:
    324
    Trophy Points:
    63
    So... we have Paul Manafort and Rick Gates being indicted. And George Papadopoulos pleading guilty to lying to the FBI.


    Discuss!

    Several things leap out to me. First, how disciplined the Mueller team has been. The Papdopoulos plea came almost a month ago and took everybody by surprise. No leak whatsoever. And apparently he's been cooperating with Mueller for 3 months now! And seemingly no one (including those in TrumpWorld) knew about that. Impressive discipline there.

    The Trump White House is the leakiest that anyone has ever seen, but that's on him. There are few to no leaks coming from Mueller.

    Now... on that cooperation from Papadopoulos. The plea deal itself describes him as a cooperating witness. Ruh-roh, Ronald. Some are suggesting he may even have been wearing a wire in recent months and talking to his old colleagues. We don't know that yet, but if so... rouble ruh-roh.



    So now, of course, Trump & Co. are trying to minimize this by claiming Papadopoulos was super-low-level, practically a “coffee boy” (as someone called him)… heck, they barely know the guy.



    Really? Do you normally tout the “coffee boy” as one of your top foreign policy advisors and an “excellent guy” as Trump did to the Washington Post in the Spring of 2016 about Papadopoulos?



    Does the “coffee boy” normally sit at the table along with you (and Jeff Sessions!) at what you yourself tweet out as a “National Security Meeting?”



    Trump: Aide at center of Russia probe 'proven to be a liar'



    (Don’t you wish at the presser where Sanders tried to say he was merely a “volunteer” that someone had said “Yeah. And now he’s volunteering information.”)



    Oh, and by the way, “In his plea filing, Papadopolous admitted that he told Trump and other top campaign national security officials during that meeting, that he had made contact with intermediaries for Russia who said they could set up a meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.”



    So he told everyone at that meeting, including Trump and Sessions, that he had been in contact with intermediaries for the Russian government.



    He also had been promised “dirt” on Clinton by the Russians by April of 2016, in the form of hacked and stolen emails. The timing is significant because the public didn’t know about any hacking until June.



    But TrumpWorld did. There are numerous emails between Papadopoulos and SENIOR officials in the Trump campaign (so-named by the plea deal) in which he mentions these hacked emails, dated before this became common knowledge. Meaning that TrumpWorld officials knew that Russia had hacked the emails and was offering them up to the Trump campaign in an effort to meddle with our election and help one side, and did not alert the FBI about it (which would have been, you know, the non-treasonous thing to do).



    The Mueller team is playing this by the book and not yet naming the “senior officials” in the campaign who were on the receiving end of Papadopoulos’s emails. So we don’t yet know exactly who they are.



    But Robert Mueller does. Rriple ruh-roh.



    Moreover, as serious as this is, one of Muller’s deputies described it this way: “The criminal justice interest being vindicated here is there's a large-scale ongoing investigation of which this case is a small part," Aaron Zelinsky of the special counsel's office said during Papadopoulos' October 5 plea agreement hearing, records of which were unsealed Monday.”



    In other words, Papadopoulos is only a small part of something larger that Mueller is putting together. Ruadruple ruh-roh.



    Perhaps it’s no surprise that Trump’s sycophants at Fox and elsewhere are barely trying to claim “no collusion” any more (though Trump himself is, amazingly, still claiming so in tweets), and pivoting to a). Trump may have colluded but Hillary colluded more!!! (Based on a uranium deal agreed to by a different branch of government than hers, but hey, she was Secretary of State at the time, so… collusion!) and/or b). Trump may have colluded but that’s not illegal!



    In point of law, often it’s not. But as a matter for impeachment (if Democrats win in 2018)… absolutely it could be grounds for that.



    And now to Manafort and Gates. Their thing is kind of the opposite: doesn’t really speak to collusion in 2016, but represents considerable legal jeopardy for them. We’re talking 10-15 years in jail here. It seems Mueller is more interested in leaning on them for past misdeeds and trying to get one or both of them to “flip” and volunteer what THEY know in return for a lighter sentence.



    Whether that happens or not is anyone’s guess. (Though it would be nice on a whole different level to see guys like this face justice for a change.)



    But both their indictments and the unsealing of Papadopoulos’s guilty plea – and the fact that they happened on the same day - are clearly a message from Mueller to others that they might want to cooperate too, lest they become the next indictment headline.



    Discuss!
     
    ecdc likes this.
  2. ecdc

    ecdc Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    110
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    Salt Lake City
    A good summary. It's interesting to read commentary from legal experts vs. pundits. The legal experts are talking about how methodical and careful Mueller is being. There are good people committed to the rule of law in this country. Mueller seems to be one of them. Someone pointed out on Twitter yesterday that there's four sealed cases that appear in between Papadopoulos and Manafort in the DC court...so more is likely on the way. This stuff takes time and we may well be into another president's term before we see its conclusion. But this stuff matters. It's necessary.

    It's amazing watching people twist into pretzels over this. Obama, one of the squeakiest clean administrations we've ever seen, and Fox News fans grasp anything and everything they can to paint him as corrupt. Trump, already one of the shadiest, most corrupt administrations in recent memory, and...fake news!

    Also: Trump supporters deeply concerned about the rule of law when it comes to black men selling loose cigarettes are not remotely concerned about the rule of law when it comes to silly little things like treason.
     
  3. iamsally

    iamsally Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,051
    Likes Received:
    1,030
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    CentralCA
    In a nutshell! And why I am tearing my hair out.

    Very good Dabob. I need summaries like that as trying to keep up with it myself makes me crazy.
    I do keep hearing echoes of "I am not a crook!"
     
  4. mawnck

    mawnck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2001
    Messages:
    711
    Likes Received:
    300
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Two things:

    (1) They are not going to impeach Trump if the Dems don't gain control of Congress.

    (2) Here's what the Dems are doing to try and get control of Congress.


    WASS
     

Share This Page